<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Timescaledb on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</title>
    <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/timescaledb/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Timescaledb on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/timescaledb/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Choosing a Time-Series Database in 2020</title>
      <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2020/11/choosing-a-time-series-database-in-2020/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2020/11/choosing-a-time-series-database-in-2020/</guid>
      <description>In 2020 the time-series database landscape had fragmented into specialised options with very different tradeoffs. InfluxDB, TimescaleDB, ClickHouse, Prometheus — each suited to different access patterns, retention requirements, and operational models.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
