<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Throughput on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</title>
    <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/throughput/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Throughput on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/throughput/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Latency vs Throughput: The False Dichotomy I Learned the Hard Way</title>
      <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2012/09/latency-vs-throughput-the-false-dichotomy-i-learned-the-hard-way/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2012/09/latency-vs-throughput-the-false-dichotomy-i-learned-the-hard-way/</guid>
      <description>Optimising for throughput and optimising for latency are often portrayed as opposites. In practice they pull in different directions but are not mutually exclusive — and confusing them leads to systems that are bad at both.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
