<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Shenandoah on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</title>
    <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/shenandoah/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Shenandoah on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/shenandoah/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>ZGC and Shenandoah: What Low-Pause GC Means for Trading Systems</title>
      <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2015/10/zgc-and-shenandoah-what-low-pause-gc-means-for-trading-systems/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2015/10/zgc-and-shenandoah-what-low-pause-gc-means-for-trading-systems/</guid>
      <description>In 2015 the JVM GC landscape was about to change significantly. ZGC and Shenandoah were in development, promising sub-millisecond GC pauses regardless of heap size. Here&amp;#39;s what the previews looked like and what they meant for latency-sensitive Java.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
