<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mechanical-Sympathy on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</title>
    <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/mechanical-sympathy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Mechanical-Sympathy on Bits, Trades &amp; Systems</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.turboawesome.win/tags/mechanical-sympathy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Mechanical Sympathy: Writing Java That Respects the Hardware</title>
      <link>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2012/12/mechanical-sympathy-writing-java-that-respects-the-hardware/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.turboawesome.win/2012/12/mechanical-sympathy-writing-java-that-respects-the-hardware/</guid>
      <description>Martin Thompson&amp;#39;s term &amp;#39;mechanical sympathy&amp;#39; reframed how I think about software performance. Here&amp;#39;s what it means in practice when writing Java for latency-sensitive systems.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
